Monocrystalline vs. Polycrystalline Solar Panels?
Monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar panels differ primarily in their manufacturing process and efficiency. Monocrystalline panels are made from a single, pure silicon crystal, giving them a uniform black appearance and higher efficiency rates, typically between 17% and 22%. They perform well in limited space and under low-light conditions, making them ideal for urban rooftops. However, their advanced production process often results in a higher upfront cost compared to other panel types.
Polycrystalline panels, on the other hand, are made from multiple silicon fragments melted together, resulting in a blue, speckled look. While their efficiency is slightly lower, averaging between 15% and 17%, they are more affordable and still perform reliably in Thailand’s abundant sunlight. In tropical conditions, the difference in performance between the two is often minimal, meaning the choice largely depends on budget, available space, and individual energy needs for homes or businesses.
Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Solar Panels: What’s the Difference?
Monocrystalline solar panels are made from a single, pure silicon crystal, giving them a uniform black appearance and higher efficiency. Because the electrons have more room to move freely within the single crystal, these panels can convert sunlight into electricity more effectively. They also tend to perform better in low-light conditions and have a longer lifespan, making them ideal for homeowners with limited roof space who want maximum power output. However, the manufacturing process is more complex and expensive, which increases their overall cost.
Polycrystalline solar panels, on the other hand, are made by melting together multiple fragments of silicon, resulting in a speckled blue appearance. While they are generally less efficient than monocrystalline panels, they are more affordable and easier to produce. Polycrystalline panels are a popular choice for larger installations where space is not an issue and cost efficiency is a priority.
| Feature | Monocrystalline (Mono) Panels | Polycrystalline (Poly) Panels |
|---|---|---|
| Cell Composition | Made from a single, pure silicon crystal. | Made from multiple silicon fragments melted together. |
| Appearance | Uniform, sleek dark black colour. | Speckled or marbled blue appearance. |
| Efficiency Range | Higher: Typically 17% to 22% (Some newer models up to 24%). | Lower: Typically 15% to 17% (The article notes this is a more affordable trade-off). |
| Cost per Watt (THB) | Higher: Approximately 25 to 40 THB per watt. | Lower: Approximately 18 to 30 THB per watt. |
| Performance in High Heat | Better Temperature Coefficient. Efficiency degrades less than Poly panels as temperatures rise above 25°C. | Less Sensitive/More Stable. Provides more stable output under high heat conditions, though efficiency is lower overall. |
| Degradation Rate | Slower: Around 0.3% to 0.5% loss of output per year. | Faster: Around 0.5% to 0.8% loss of output per year. |
| Best for Limited Space | Yes (Preferred). Their higher efficiency means you need fewer panels to meet your energy needs. | No. Their lower efficiency means you require more panels and greater roof area for the same output. |
| Overall Value Proposition | Higher upfront cost but superior long-term performance and energy yield, often leading to a quicker and greater Return on Investment (ROI). | Lower initial cost and a practical, reliable choice for properties with large, unshaded roof space and tighter budgets. |
Efficiency of Monocrystalline vs Polycrystalline Panels
Monocrystalline solar panels are known for their high efficiency, typically ranging from 17% to 22%. They are made from a single continuous crystal structure, allowing electrons to move more freely and generate electricity more effectively. This results in better performance under low-light conditions and higher power output per square meter. Because of their superior efficiency, monocrystalline panels are ideal for residential or commercial installations with limited roof space where maximising energy production is a priority.
Polycrystalline solar panels, in contrast, are manufactured from multiple silicon crystals melted together, which creates boundaries that slightly reduce efficiency—usually between 15% and 17%. While they produce less energy per unit area, they are more cost-effective to manufacture and install. Polycrystalline panels still provide consistent, dependable performance and are a practical choice for projects with ample installation space or for users seeking a balance between efficiency and affordability.
Cost of Monocrystalline vs Polycrystalline Panels in Thailand
In Thailand, the cost of solar panels can vary depending on the type, quality, and supplier. Monocrystalline panels typically range from 25 to 40 baht per watt, making them more expensive than polycrystalline options. This higher price is mainly due to the more advanced manufacturing process and the panels’ greater efficiency in converting sunlight into electricity. For homeowners or businesses with limited roof space, the improved performance of monocrystalline panels can justify the higher initial cost, as fewer panels are required to meet energy needs.
Polycrystalline panels, on the other hand, are generally priced between 18 and 30 baht per watt, offering a more budget-friendly solution. Their lower efficiency means that more panels may be needed to produce the same output as monocrystalline ones, but for installations with abundant space, this is rarely a problem. This affordability makes polycrystalline panels a popular choice for large-scale or rural solar projects in Thailand.
Performance in Thailand’s Tropical Climate
Thailand’s tropical climate, marked by high temperatures, intense humidity, and strong sunlight throughout the year, greatly influences the performance of solar panels. The heat and consistent exposure to UV radiation can affect energy conversion efficiency and long-term durability. Monocrystalline panels, known for their high efficiency and sleek design, generally achieve the best performance under moderate temperatures and direct sunlight. However, in Thailand’s heat, their efficiency can slightly decrease as temperatures rise. Recent innovations, such as improved cell architecture and heat-dissipating materials, have significantly reduced this drawback, making them increasingly viable in tropical environments.
Polycrystalline panels, on the other hand, are less sensitive to temperature changes and provide more stable output under high heat conditions. Although they typically have a lower efficiency compared to monocrystalline panels, their reliability and cost-effectiveness make them suitable for Thailand’s conditions. The choice often depends on budget, installation space, and the desired balance between efficiency and performance stability.
Choosing Solar Panels for Limited Space
For homeowners or businesses with limited roof space, choosing the right type of solar panel is crucial to maximise energy production. Monocrystalline solar panels are often the preferred option because of their high efficiency and sleek design. These panels are made from a single continuous crystal structure, allowing them to convert more sunlight into electricity compared to other types. This means you can achieve the same power output with fewer panels, making them ideal for small rooftops or compact installations.
Additionally, monocrystalline panels tend to perform better in low-light conditions, providing consistent energy generation throughout the day. Although they may cost more upfront, their durability and long lifespan make them a worthwhile investment for space-constrained properties. Pairing these panels with efficient inverters and battery storage systems can further enhance performance, ensuring reliable renewable energy production even when roof space is limited.
Best Solar Panels for Thailand’s Hot Climate
Thailand’s abundant sunshine provides excellent conditions for solar energy generation, but the country’s high temperatures can affect panel efficiency. When choosing the best solar panels for Thailand’s climate, it’s important to consider both performance and heat tolerance. Monocrystalline panels are known for their high efficiency and sleek design, making them ideal for areas with strong sunlight. They perform well in high insolation conditions, delivering more power output per square meter compared to other types.
However, in regions where heat levels remain consistently high, polycrystalline panels may offer better long-term reliability. Although they are slightly less efficient, they tend to handle higher temperatures more effectively, maintaining steady output and durability. Some homeowners and businesses also opt for advanced half-cut cell or bifacial technologies, which further improve energy generation and heat management. Overall, selecting the right panel type for Thailand’s hot climate can ensure both optimal performance and long-term energy savings.
Degradation Rate of Solar Panels in Hot Climates
Solar panel degradation is a natural process that gradually reduces the energy output of the panels over time. In hot climates, this process tends to accelerate due to prolonged exposure to high temperatures and intense sunlight. Heat can cause thermal stress on the photovoltaic cells, leading to microscopic cracks and material fatigue. UV radiation also contributes to the breakdown of encapsulant materials and discoloration, both of which reduce overall panel performance and lifespan.
The degradation rate varies depending on panel type and manufacturing quality. Monocrystalline panels generally degrade at a slower rate—around 0.3% to 0.5% per year—compared to polycrystalline panels, which can degrade at about 0.5% to 0.8% annually. Over 25 years, this difference can significantly impact energy production and financial returns. In hot regions, choosing high-quality panels with heat-resistant materials and proper ventilation can help mitigate degradation and maintain higher efficiency over time.
Temperature Coefficient and Its Effect on Solar Panel Performance
The temperature coefficient of a solar panel indicates how its efficiency changes with temperature. As the temperature increases, the panel’s electrical output decreases because excessive heat reduces the voltage generated by the solar cells. The coefficient is expressed as a percentage loss per degree Celsius above 25°C, the standard testing temperature. For example, a coefficient of -0.4%/°C means that for every degree above 25°C, the panel’s efficiency drops by 0.4%.
Both monocrystalline and polycrystalline panels have temperature coefficients, but polycrystalline types generally handle heat slightly better. This makes them suitable for tropical regions like Thailand, where temperatures frequently exceed 30°C. However, monocrystalline panels, despite being more sensitive to heat, usually provide higher overall efficiency and better power output in most conditions. Therefore, while polycrystalline panels can be more stable in hot climates, monocrystalline panels remain the preferred choice when maximum performance is the main priority.
Cost vs Efficiency: Finding the Balance
When choosing between monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar panels, it’s important to consider both cost and efficiency to achieve the best value. Monocrystalline panels are made from a single crystal structure, allowing them to convert sunlight into electricity more efficiently. They perform better in low-light conditions and take up less space, making them ideal for homeowners with limited roof area or those looking for maximum energy output. However, this higher performance comes with a higher upfront cost, which may not suit every budget.
Polycrystalline panels, on the other hand, are made from multiple silicon fragments melted together, resulting in slightly lower efficiency. They generally require more surface area to produce the same amount of energy as monocrystalline panels but come at a more affordable price. This makes them a practical choice for those with larger installation areas or tighter budgets, offering a solid balance between performance and cost-effectiveness.
Solar Panel Installation Costs in Thailand
The cost of installing a solar system in Thailand varies widely based on several factors, including the type of solar panels, system capacity, installation complexity, and regional labour rates. Monocrystalline panels, known for their high efficiency and sleek design, typically come with higher upfront costs due to more advanced manufacturing processes. In contrast, polycrystalline panels are generally cheaper to produce and install, making them an attractive option for homeowners or businesses looking for a cost-effective renewable energy solution.
Additional factors influencing installation costs include roof type, mounting structure, inverter quality, and wiring requirements. In urban areas such as Bangkok or Chiang Mai, labour costs may be slightly higher than in rural provinces. On average, residential solar installations in Thailand range from 35,000 to 60,000 THB per kilowatt, depending on system size and component quality. Larger systems benefit from economies of scale, reducing the cost per kilowatt installed.
Long-Term Energy Savings with Solar Power in Thailand
Investing in solar energy in Thailand offers substantial long-term financial benefits, as the country’s abundant sunlight allows for efficient power generation throughout the year. By harnessing solar power, homeowners and businesses can significantly reduce their dependence on grid electricity, leading to lower monthly utility bills. Over time, these savings can offset the initial installation costs, making solar energy an increasingly attractive option for both residential and commercial users. Additionally, government incentives and declining solar equipment prices continue to enhance the overall return on investment.
The extent of your savings depends on the type and efficiency of the solar panels installed. Monocrystalline panels, known for their high efficiency and durability, typically deliver greater energy output and faster payback periods. However, polycrystalline panels remain a practical choice for those with larger installation areas, offering reliable performance at a lower cost. With proper design and maintenance, solar systems can provide consistent savings for decades.
Solar Panel Warranties and Lifespan
Solar panel warranties provide assurance of long-term performance and durability. Both monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar panels usually come with warranties ranging from 20 to 25 years, covering performance and manufacturing defects. These warranties guarantee that the panels will maintain a certain percentage of their original efficiency, ensuring consistent energy production over decades. The length and quality of the warranty are key indicators of a manufacturer’s confidence in the product’s reliability.
Monocrystalline panels generally have a longer expected lifespan and a stronger warranty compared to polycrystalline panels. Their higher purity silicon allows them to operate more efficiently and degrade more slowly over time. This results in better performance in low-light conditions and a more consistent energy yield throughout their lifetime. For homeowners and businesses seeking long-term energy savings and sustainability, monocrystalline panels are often the preferred choice, offering excellent returns on investment through efficiency and durability.
The Future of Solar Energy in Thailand
Thailand’s solar energy sector is entering an exciting phase of growth as technology becomes more advanced and affordable. Both monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar panels have improved in efficiency, allowing households and businesses to generate more power from the same surface area. With the falling cost of installation and maintenance, solar systems are now within reach for a wider segment of the population. These advancements are helping Thailand reduce its dependence on fossil fuels and lower greenhouse gas emissions.
Government support has been a major driving force behind this progress. Incentives such as tax benefits, feed-in tariffs, and grants encourage investment in solar energy projects. As Thailand aims to increase its share of renewable energy, solar power is expected to play a key role in achieving national sustainability goals. With continuous innovation and strong policy backing, Thailand is well-positioned to become a regional leader in solar energy adoption.
Final Thoughts …
While the debate between Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline panels often centers on efficiency and cost for standard grid-tied setups, this choice becomes even more critical when planning for energy independence. For homeowners looking to install a hybrid solar system that incorporates battery storage, the higher efficiency of Monocrystalline panels can be advantageous, as they maximize energy generation from a limited roof area, providing more power to charge the battery bank quickly. Furthermore, if your long-term goal is to go entirely off-grid for complete energy autonomy, selecting the most efficient panel type (Mono) is often recommended to ensure maximum power capture, reliability, and quicker payback on the entire system, especially where every watt counts.
When deciding between monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar panels, it’s important to assess your energy goals, available space, and budget. Monocrystalline panels offer higher efficiency and a sleek appearance, making them suitable for homes or businesses with limited installation areas. Although they come with a higher upfront cost, their long lifespan and superior energy production can provide greater returns over time.
On the other hand, polycrystalline panels are a practical and cost-effective choice for those prioritizing affordability without compromising reliability. They perform well under standard conditions and are ideal for larger properties with sufficient roof space. Considering factors such as Thailand’s warm climate, potential shading, and maintenance requirements will help you select the most suitable system. Ultimately, both options contribute to long-term energy savings and sustainability, allowing you to harness Thailand’s abundant sunlight efficiently while reducing dependence on conventional energy sources.
If you’d like to learn more or want a friendly chat obligation free then why not call us on +66 82 704 6939 or contact us today we will be happy to help
FAQs
Monocrystalline PV cells are made from a single, pure silicon crystal, offering higher efficiency and a uniform black colour. Polycrystalline solar cells are made from multiple silicon crystal fragments, which makes them more cost-effective but slightly less efficient.
Monocrystalline solar panels generally have a better temperature coefficient, meaning their efficiency degrades less than polycrystalline panels as temperatures rise above 25°C. This makes them a preferable option for the intense heat in Thailand.
Monocrystalline (Mono) panels are generally considered better for most homeowners and commercial applications due to their higher efficiency (typically 17% to 22%) and superior long-term performance. They produce more power per square meter, making them ideal when roof space is limited.
Polycrystalline solar panels are typically the more affordable option regarding the initial purchase cost, as their manufacturing process is simpler and uses less pure silicon.
Monocrystalline solar panels are recommended for limited roof space because their higher efficiency means you can generate more solar power per square metre, requiring fewer panels for the same energy yield.
Monocrystalline solar panels typically have an efficiency range of around 18% to 24%, which is among the highest for commercial PV technology.
Polycrystalline solar panels typically have a slightly lower efficiency range, often between 13% and 17%
Modern high-quality monocrystalline panels often perform better than polycrystalline panels in low light or cloudy conditions, making them ideal for areas with less consistent sun exposure.
Monocrystalline solar modules usually have a uniform, dark black colour, while polycrystalline modules have a speckled or marbled blue appearance.
Both types of PV panels typically come with a 25-year performance warranty, but monocrystalline panels, due to their higher-purity single-crystal structure, are often projected to have a slightly longer operational lifespan.
The temperature coefficient measures how much a solar panel’s efficiency drops for every degree Celsius rise above 25°C. A lower (closer to zero) coefficient is better for hot regions like Thailand.
The production of polycrystalline PV cells is generally considered to create less silicon waste than the production of the single-crystal silicon used in monocrystalline panels.
While high ambient humidity affects all solar panels, choosing a high-quality PV module with robust construction is more critical than the cell type to mitigate long-term moisture degradation in a tropical climate.
Yes, due to their lower efficiency, you will need a larger number of polycrystalline panels to achieve the same total power output as a monocrystalline solar array, thus requiring more roof space.
Monocrystalline panels are often preferred for off-grid solar systems where maximising the energy yield from a fixed, limited space is paramount.
While polycrystalline panels have a lower initial cost, the higher efficiency and superior long-term performance of monocrystalline panels in high temperatures can often lead to a quicker and greater return on investment (ROI).
Yes, the quality and efficiency can vary significantly between different manufacturers and product lines for both mono and poly PV technologies. It is important to check the panel specifications.
Monocrystalline panels are generally considered more aesthetically pleasing due to their sleek, uniform dark colour, which can blend better with modern rooflines.
Aside from efficiency, key specifications to compare include the temperature coefficient, the panel’s wattage output, and the annual degradation rate.
Yes, a polycrystalline solar power system remains a viable and more cost-effective choice for properties with large, unshaded roof space where maximising the initial investment is a key concern.
Newer monocrystalline designs, particularly with half-cut cell technology, can often handle partial shading better than traditional polycrystalline modules.
It is recommended to check local solar installation companies in Thailand that offer certified products and reputable warranties for both monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar array solutions. Here at Solar Panels Thailand we can of course can also help
Monocrystalline panels generally have a slightly longer effective lifespan and a better performance warranty.
- Monocrystalline Lifespan: Typically 25 to 30 years, with some premium models lasting up to 40 years. They have a lower annual degradation rate (around 0.3% to 0.5% loss per year).
- Polycrystalline Lifespan: Also typically 25 years. Their higher degradation rate (around 0.5% to 0.8% loss per year) means their power output drops faster than monocrystalline over the system’s lifetime.
Yes, you can mix monocrystalline and polycrystalline panels, but it is not generally recommended for optimal system performance, especially if they are wired in the same series (string).
If mixed, all panels in a single string will be limited by the lowest-performing panel’s voltage and current. To mix them efficiently, you must use Microinverters or Power Optimizers on each panel, or wire them into separate circuits using an inverter with multiple Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) channels. This ensures each panel operates at its peak efficiency.
Yes, Monocrystalline panels are generally better in hot weather compared to traditional Polycrystalline panels. Their key advantage is a more favourable Temperature Coefficient, meaning their efficiency degrades less for every degree the panel temperature rises above the standard testing condition (). While all silicon-based PV cells lose some efficiency in high heat, Mono panels lose less, providing a consistently higher energy yield in tropical or very warm climates.
The 33% rule (or 133% rule) is a common electrical regulation (e.g., in some international codes) regarding inverter oversizing. It states that the total DC panel capacity (watts) connected to an inverter can exceed the inverter’s AC output capacity by a maximum of 33%.
For example, a 5 kW AC inverter can be connected to up to 6.65 kW DC of solar panels (). This practice, known as oversizing or clipping, is intentional to maximize energy production during low-light periods (mornings, evenings, cloudy days), as panels rarely hit 100% of their nameplate capacity.
The average service lifespan for both monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar panels is 25 years. Most reputable manufacturers offer a 25-year performance warranty, guaranteeing the panel will still produce at least 80-85% of its original rated power by the end of that period. Monocrystalline panels often retain a higher percentage of their original output due to a slower annual power degradation rate.
You can mix different wattage solar panels, but it is strongly discouraged if they are wired in series. When different sized panels are connected in the same string, the entire circuit’s performance is limited by the panel with the lowest current (Amps), which is typically the smaller 100-watt panel. This results in the larger 200-watt panel operating inefficiently. The best practice is to wire panels with different wattages or models to individual Microinverters or Power Optimizers.
The “20% rule” in solar can refer to two separate concepts:
- System Sizing (Energy Need): A common recommendation to oversize your system by 20% to account for variations in weather, seasonal changes, and system degradation over time. (e.g., if you need 1,000 kWh/month, install a system capable of 1,200 kWh/month).
- Efficiency Benchmark: It is often used informally as a benchmark, indicating that high-quality, modern solar panels should have an efficiency rating of at least 20% or more.
Mixing different PV cell types is possible but must be done carefully, usually requiring a specialised inverter setup to manage the different voltage and efficiency characteristics of the panels.
The Monocrystalline (Mono) panel is generally considered the best type of solar panel for home use, for the following reasons:
- Highest Efficiency: Maximize energy production on limited residential roof space.
- Aesthetics: The uniform, dark black appearance is preferred by most homeowners.
- Longevity: Lower degradation rate ensures better performance over the 25-year lifespan.
Yes, installing a solar power system, particularly one utilizing high-efficiency monocrystalline panels, can significantly increase a home’s value. Studies have shown that homes with owned (not leased) solar panels often sell faster and for a higher price than comparable non-solar homes, with value increases averaging 4% or more. The perception of owning a high-performing, durable renewable energy system is a major selling point.
The biggest risk related to solar panels is typically improper installation or electrical hazards. For homeowners, this risk manifests as:
- Fire Risk: Poor wiring, faulty connectors, or low-quality components can lead to arc faults and fire. This is mitigated by professional installation and the use of modern safety features like Arc-Fault Circuit Interrupters (AFCIs).
- Roof Damage: Poorly sealed mounting hardware can lead to water leakage and long-term roof degradation.
- Performance Risk: Choosing a non-reputable installer or low-quality components can lead to system underperformance, preventing the system from achieving its calculated Return on Investment (ROI).
The disadvantages of monocrystalline solar technology include:
- Higher Initial Cost: The single-crystal production process is more expensive.
- Manufacturing Waste: The process of creating the single silicon crystal (ingot) results in more wasted silicon material compared to the block casting used for polycrystalline cells.
- Sensitivity to Shading: If even a small part of a monocrystalline panel is shaded, the output of the entire string (series) can drop dramatically, making the use of power optimizers or microinverters essential.
You can easily distinguish between the two cell types primarily by their visual appearance:
Monocrystalline solar panels are designed to last a minimum of 25 to 30 years. The key factor is their performance warranty, which guarantees a high output (typically 80-85%) remains after 25 years. With proper maintenance, the physical panels and mounting hardware can often remain functional for 40 years or more.
The type of solar panel with the highest efficiency is the Monocrystalline panel, specifically those manufactured using advanced technologies like N-Type cells or Back-Contact (IBC) architecture.
- Current Commercial High: Modern premium monocrystalline panels can achieve efficiencies of 22% to 24.8%.
- General Mono Range: Standard monocrystalline panels typically range from 17% to 21%.
The disadvantages of polycrystalline (Poly) solar panels primarily stem from their manufacturing process, resulting in lower efficiency and reduced performance compared to monocrystalline (Mono) technology:
Lower Efficiency: The fragmented structure of the silicon crystals results in a lower typical efficiency range of to . This means they convert less sunlight into electricity than Mono panels, requiring more panels and greater roof area to achieve the same total power output.
Worse Performance in High Heat: Poly panels have a higher temperature coefficient, leading to a more significant drop in power output when the panel temperature rises above 25°C (Standard Test Conditions). This is a notable drawback in tropical or very hot climates.
Higher Degradation Rate: They experience a faster annual degradation rate (around 0.5% to 0.8% loss per year). Over the 25-year warranty period, this quicker efficiency drop results in a substantial loss of total lifetime power production.
Increased Space Requirement: Due to lower power density, a larger footprint is needed to generate the same wattage, making them a poor choice for small residential roofs or applications with limited space.
Aesthetic Appearance: The panels have a characteristic speckled blue or marbled look, which is often considered less modern and less aesthetically pleasing than the sleek, uniform black of monocrystalline panels.
This article nails the central dilemma perfectly: cost vs. space/efficiency. I think the key takeaway for anyone reading in Thailand is to first measure your available unshaded roof space. If you’re constrained, Mono is the only logical choice because that higher 22% efficiency lets you maximize every square meter. If your roof is enormous, then Polycrystalline becomes a highly competitive, budget-friendly option. I appreciate you focusing on the temperature coefficient too, as a stable output in this tropical heat is often more valuable than a high peak output that immediately drops when the temperature hits 40°C. Excellent breakdown of the Thai market specifics.
Interesting analysis and Good read Thanks!
I installed Mono panels last year and I can confirm what the article says about the appearance. The sleek, uniform black design looks fantastic on my villa roof—it just blends in, and the curb appeal is definitely improved. But more important than the looks is the performance during the low light hours, like early morning and late afternoon. My energy monitoring app shows they still kick out decent power even when the sun isn’t directly overhead, which is exactly where Mono panels win over Poly. The higher efficiency means my batteries get topped up quicker. For me, that little bit of extra efficiency every day really adds up over the years, making the initial investment worth every baht. 😉
Look, I get it, Mono is better. But I have a huge warehouse roof and a super tight budget. The difference in price between the two, especially when buying thousands of watts, is massive. I can get 5kW more system for the same price if I go with Poly. That extra power output, even at lower efficiency, is better than paying way more for the “best” panels. It’s about ROI. If I’m paying 10 baht less per watt, that saves me serious coin on a big project. You gotta be practical about these things. Good artical, but the cost section is the most important part for me! 🎉
Thanks for clarifying the temperature coefficient! I’m a student researching PV degradation in tropical environments and I was trying to find real-world cost comparisons. The table listing the approximate price per watt (18-30 THB for Poly) is extremely helpful for my financial modeling. It seems like Poly is the clear winner for cost-effective large-scale solar farms where land (or roof) is cheap, but Mono maintains its dominance for the urban residential market in places like Pattaya or Phuket. Can you follow up with a piece on the performance differences in low-light conditions during the heavy monsoon season? That’s another huge factor here.
Hi Dreamjili,
Thanks for the great suggestion! A monsoon season performance article is definitely on our content calendar. In brief though: during heavy monsoon periods, monocrystalline panels typically maintain 15-25% of rated output on overcast days, while polycrystalline panels drop to around 10-18%. The diffuse light conditions during monsoons actually favor mono panels’ superior low-light performance even more than normal cloudy days.
For your research, you might also find it interesting that monsoon season performance gaps widen further in the 6-8am and 4-6pm windows when light levels are already reduced. This can mean 10-12% more annual energy harvest in regions like Surat Thani or Ranong that experience extended rainy seasons.
Good luck with your research! Feel free to reach out if you need any real-world installation data.
Cheers,
Solar Panels Thailand Team
Monocrystaline panels are totaly worth the extra money, esp. if you are tring to get off the grid one day. My system with Poly panels is ok but in the rainy season I wish I had more power coming in to charge the battery bank. I think people worry too much about the upfront cost and not enough about the lifetime of the system. I also think the black mono panels just look way better on the roof of a nice house, the blue ones look kinda old fashioned now. Great article!
I disagree a little bit about the heat. I live down south in Krabi and the heat here is brutal year-round. My installer convinced me to go Polycrystalline because of the stability and the slightly lower temperature coefficient. While I know I’m sacrificing a bit of peak efficiency, I’d rather have a more consistent, less degraded output over the full 25-year warranty period, especially considering how much cheaper the Poly panels were initially. I had a huge roof, so space wasn’t an issue at all. For big rural installs, Poly is still the best bang for your baht, hands down.
Hi Harold,
That’s actually a really valid point, and your installer gave you solid advice for your specific situation. You’re absolutely right that for large rural installations with abundant roof space and budget constraints, polycrystalline panels offer excellent value. The slightly better heat stability you mentioned is real, particularly in consistently hot regions like Krabi where temperatures rarely drop.
The key difference is that while poly panels are more stable in heat, mono panels still typically produce more total power even after accounting for heat losses, but that advantage matters less when space isn’t constrained and you can simply install more poly panels for the same budget.
Your approach of prioritizing consistent output over peak efficiency for a large-scale install is exactly the kind of practical thinking that makes sense for commercial or rural properties. Thanks for sharing your real-world experience from Krabi!
Best regards,
Solar Panels Thailand Team
This article is super timely. I’m building a new shophouse in Bangkok and roof space is seriously limited. I was leaning towards the cheaper Poly panels, but after reading your breakdown on efficiency (17-22% for Mono vs 15-17% for Poly), it makes total sense to go Monocrystalline. The higher upfront cost is worth the extra power output since I simply can’t fit enough Poly panels to hit my energy needs. The table breaking down the cost per watt in THB (25-40 THB for Mono) versus the long-term ROI was the convincing factor. Great info!
Gr8 article! I installd poly panels on my house in rayong last yr and honestly theyre working fine for my needs. yea the efficiency is a bit lower but i had plenty of roof space so wasnt a problem. The price difference was huge tho, saved like 80000 baht going with polycrystalline instead of mono panels. That money went into a better inverter and battery storage system instead which i think was smarter for me. My electrician said for tropical weather like ours the poly panels actualy handle the heat pretty good and give stable power output even when its crazy hot. Only thing i wish is they looked better, the blue speckled appearance isnt as sleek as those black mono panels but whatever, im more interested in the energy savings on my electric bill lol. Been monitoring my system for 8 months now and its generatng way more power than i expected, even on cloudy days. If ur on a budget and got the roof space definately consider poly panels, dont let ppl tell u mono is the only way to go. 🤔
Excellent breakdown of the key differences in solar cell technology. The comparison table showing efficiency ranges, degradation rates, and temperature coefficients is incredibly useful for making an informed decision. I’m particularly interested in the performance characteristics in high heat conditions since I’m planning a solar installation for a commercial property in Bangkok. From your analysis, it seems monocrystalline panels with their superior temperature coefficient would maintain higher efficiency when panel temperatures exceed 25 degrees Celsius, which happens basically every day here. However, I’m curious about the real world performance differences during monsoon season when we have extended periods of cloud cover and reduced sunlight. You mentioned mono panels perform better in low light conditions, but could you quantify that difference? For instance, on an overcast day, what percentage of rated capacity would each panel type typically achieve? Also, regarding the 33% oversizing rule you mention in the FAQs, would you recommend different sizing strategies depending on whether someone chooses monocrystalline or polycrystalline technology? I’m trying to optimize my system design for maximum energy yield while staying within my budget constraints. The long term energy savings potential is my main priority, so understanding these performance nuances really matters. Thanks for such a thorough resource on solar power systems in Thailand.
Hi SpinphTHA,
Excellent technical questions! Let me address them:
Low-light performance: On a heavily overcast day, quality monocrystalline panels typically operate at around 15-25% of their rated capacity, while polycrystalline panels usually achieve 10-18%. The difference becomes more pronounced during early morning and late afternoon hours. Over a full year in Bangkok, this can translate to roughly 8-12% more total energy harvest with mono panels.
Regarding the 33% oversizing strategy: Yes, we do recommend different approaches. For monocrystalline systems, you can be slightly more conservative with oversizing (maybe 25-30%) because their better low-light performance means they reach peak output more often. For polycrystalline systems, we often recommend the full 33% oversizing to compensate for their lower efficiency during sub-optimal conditions.
For a commercial installation in Bangkok where maximum energy yield is your priority, I’d strongly lean toward monocrystalline panels despite the higher upfront cost. The combination of better heat tolerance, superior low-light performance, and lower degradation rates typically delivers 18-25% better ROI over the 25-year system lifetime for commercial applications.
We’d be happy to run some detailed performance modeling for your specific property using our solar simulation software. This would give you month-by-month projections comparing both technologies. Just reach out through our contact page or call +66 82 704 6939.
Best regards,
Solar Panels Thailand Team
This article really helped me understand the efficiency differences between monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar technology. I’ve been comparing solar panel prices in Thailand for my new home in Chiang Mai, and the cost breakdown (25-40 THB per watt for mono versus 18-30 baht per watt for poly panels) is exactly what I needed to see in writing. My roof space is pretty limited, so maximizing power output per square meter makes sense even if the initial investment is higher. The temperature coefficient information was particularly valuable since we get those brutal hot season months where temperatures hit 38-40 degrees regularly. I’m leaning toward monocrystalline panels now because the lower degradation rate (0.3-0.5% annually) means better long term energy production over the 25 year warranty period. One question though: do you have recommendations for specific brands that perform well in Thailand’s tropical climate? I want to make sure I’m getting quality panels with good heat tolerance and not just the cheapest option. The information about how mono panels handle low light conditions better is also relevant for our rainy season. Really comprehensive guide, thanks for breaking down all the technical specifications in a way that’s easy to understand for someone new to solar energy systems. 👍
Hi David,
Great question! For Chiang Mai’s climate, we typically recommend brands like Jinko Solar, Longi, or Trina Solar for their monocrystalline panels. These manufacturers have excellent heat tolerance ratings and proven track records in Southeast Asian conditions. Specifically, look for panels with a temperature coefficient around -0.35%/°C or better (lower is better).
For your situation with limited roof space in Chiang Mai, I’d suggest considering Jinko’s Tiger Neo series or Longi’s Hi-MO 6 range. Both offer efficiency ratings above 21% and handle our hot season temperatures really well. They also come with solid 25-year performance warranties backed by established service networks in Thailand.
During rainy season, the superior low-light performance of mono panels typically gives you about 10-15% more energy generation compared to poly panels on overcast days, which really adds up over the year.
Feel free to give us a call on +66 82 704 6939 if you’d like to discuss specific system sizing for your Chiang Mai property. We can also arrange a site visit to assess your roof orientation and shading.
Cheers!
Fantastic article, really thorough. I’ve been living in Bangkok for 8 years and finally convinced my wife we should invest in solar for our townhouse. After reading this and doing more research, I’m leaning towards mono despite the higher cost. My only concern is finding a reliable installer who won’t disappear after installation. We had a terrible experience with another home improvement contractor last year who did shoddy work and then ghosted us when we had issues. Are there any certifications or accreditations we should look for when choosing a solar installer in Thailand? I want to make sure we’re dealing with someone reputable who’ll actually honor the warranties and provide ongoing support.
Your concern about installer reliability is unfortunately very valid. Finding a reputable installer is just as important as choosing the right panels. Here’s what to look for:
Manufacturer certifications from the panel brands they install
Physical office location you can visit (not just a mobile number)
Registered company with VAT registration
Portfolio of installations you can actually visit
References from customers with systems at least 2 years old
Clear written warranty terms (both panel warranty and workmanship warranty)
Membership in Thai renewable energy associations
I’m actually working on a comprehensive guide called “Choosing a Reliable Solar Installer in Thailand” because this is such a critical issue. In the meantime, feel free to email me if you’d like specific installer recommendations for Bangkok townhouses. I maintain a list of installers we trust based on customer feedback and track records. Don’t rush the decision, taking time to find the right installer is worth it for a 25-year investment!
My company just installed mono panels on our office building in Rayong industrial area last month. The installation team said mono is definitely better for Thailand because of the heat. They explained that when panels get very hot (which happens all the time here!), mono panels lose less efficiency than poly. Since we’re running aircon all day anyway, every bit of efficiency matters for our electricity bill. Installation took 3 days and already seeing reduction in our monthly costs.
Congratulations on your new installation! Your installers explained it perfectly. Monocrystalline panels have a better temperature coefficient, meaning they lose less efficiency when they get very hot. In Rayong’s industrial area where temperatures regularly hit 35-40°C, this makes a real difference. You should see consistent performance even during the hottest months. Keep track of your monthly savings and consider sharing your results after 6-12 months of operation. Real data from Rayong’s industrial applications would be valuable for other businesses considering solar. Thanks for sharing your experience!
stupid question maybe but can you mix both types?? like use mono on the small roof area that gets best sun and poly on the bigger roof section that’s partially shaded? or does that create problems with the system?
Not a stupid question at all! Technically yes, you can mix panel types, but it’s generally not recommended for several reasons. The different panels will have different voltage and current characteristics, which creates complications for the inverter and can reduce overall system efficiency. You’d need careful design with separate strings or multiple inverters, adding cost and complexity. A better solution would be using all mono panels but sizing your system for the best sun exposure areas first, then expanding later if needed. Or consider power optimizers which help mixed conditions perform better. I’d recommend sticking with one panel type for simplicity and optimal performance. Good thinking about creative solutions though!
Appreciate the detailed comparison. I run a small resort in Krabi and we’re looking at a fairly large installation, around 50kW. At that scale, the efficiency differences really add up. We had an energy audit done and they recommended mono panels specifically because of our limited roof space across the buildings. The higher upfront cost gets spread across more panels anyway, and the consultant showed us projections where we’d break even about 18 months sooner with mono vs poly. For commercial applications in Thailand, it seems like mono makes more financial sense even though it’s initially more expensive.
Your consultant gave you excellent advice for a commercial installation, Robert. At 50kW scale with limited roof space, the efficiency advantage of monocrystalline panels really demonstrates its value. That 18-month faster payback on a resort property is significant, especially considering your year-round occupancy and consistent energy demand. For commercial applications in Thailand’s hospitality sector, we almost always recommend mono panels for exactly the reasons you mentioned. The higher upfront cost becomes negligible when spread across a larger system, and the better performance in heat justifies itself quickly. Thanks for sharing this commercial perspective, it’s really valuable for other business owners considering solar!
what about cleaning? is one type easier to clean than other? dust is big problem here in dry season
Good practical question! Both mono and poly panels have smooth glass surfaces that clean the same way. Neither is significantly easier to clean than the other. The bigger factor is the frame design and how it channels water and debris. For Thailand’s dry season dust, I recommend hosing panels down every 2-3 months, or after particularly dusty periods. Some installers offer cleaning services, or you can do it yourself safely if you have easy roof access. Just use water and a soft brush, no harsh chemicals needed. Dust buildup can reduce output by 5-15%, so cleaning does make a worthwhile difference!
poly panels on my condo building in Sathorn been running 4 years now, no issues whatsoever. think people worry too much about the “premium” option when poly works perfectly fine for most situations
Thanks for sharing your experience! You’re right that quality poly panels perform very reliably. Your 4-year track record in Sathorn is good evidence. The “premium” option isn’t always necessary, especially for installations with ample space and good sun exposure. The key is matching the technology to the specific situation. Both panel types work well in Thailand when properly installed and maintained. Appreciate you adding this real-world perspective!
Very informative post! I shared this with my husband who has been researching solar for our home in Hua Hin for months now. He’s an engineer and tends to overthink everything, so having the comparison laid out clearly like this really helps. We have a decent sized roof but also quite a few trees that create partial shading during certain times of day. Based on what you wrote about mono performing better in low light conditions, it seems like that might be the better choice for us even though it costs more upfront. Would you agree with that assessment? 😊
Your assessment is spot on! With partial shading from trees, monocrystalline panels are definitely the better choice. They handle shaded conditions much more gracefully than polycrystalline. Additionally, consider discussing microinverters or power optimizers with your installer. These technologies ensure that shading on one panel doesn’t drag down the performance of your entire array. For a Hua Hin installation with tree shading, the combination of mono panels plus microinverters or optimizers would give you the best possible performance. The extra upfront cost will pay back through better real-world output. Please give your husband our regards, us engineers do tend to overthink things but in this case, his thorough research will pay off!
Question about the warranty differences. You mentioned 25 years for mono vs 20-25 for poly. Does the Thai heat and humidity typically cause panels to degrade faster than the manufacturer specs suggest? I’m worried about putting a big investment into something that might not last as long as promised in this climate.
That’s a very smart concern. In Thailand’s climate, panels do experience slightly faster degradation than in temperate climates, but quality panels from reputable manufacturers still perform close to specifications. Most panels lose about 0.5-0.8% efficiency per year, slightly higher in extreme heat. After 25 years, expect around 80-85% of original output. The key is choosing panels with a strong warranty backed by a manufacturer who’ll actually be around in 25 years and has a Thai service presence. Tier 1 manufacturers with local support are crucial. I’m planning an article specifically on warranty considerations and long-term performance in Thai conditions, as this is such an important topic. Great question!
My brother install poly panel 2 year ago in Khon Kaen, still working good no problem. I think maybe poly is okay if you have big roof space like we have in countryside? City people with small roof maybe need mono.
You’re absolutely right! If you have plenty of roof space and aren’t limited by area, polycrystalline panels can be a smart, cost-effective choice. Your brother’s experience in Khon Kaen proves that poly panels perform reliably in Thai conditions. The mono vs poly decision really depends on individual circumstances. Rural properties with large roofs and tight budgets often do very well with quality poly panels. Thanks for sharing your real-world experience!
Great timing on this post. Just got quotes from three different companies here in Pattaya and the pricing varies wildly. One is pushing Chinese poly panels saying they’re “just as good” but 40% cheaper. Another insists only German mono panels will survive Thailand’s weather. The third is somewhere in between with Korean mono panels. It’s honestly confusing as hell trying to figure out who’s telling the truth and who’s just trying to make a bigger sale. Any recommendations on reputable brands that actually perform well in Thai conditions?
Your confusion is completely understandable, James. The solar industry in Thailand has some excellent installers and unfortunately some who oversell or cut corners. Here’s my honest take: Chinese poly panels have improved dramatically and many are perfectly good quality, but verify the brand’s track record. German mono panels are excellent but you’re paying a premium for the brand. Korean manufacturers like Hanwha Q Cells offer a great middle ground with solid warranties and good performance in tropical conditions. I’m actually planning a detailed article on “How to Choose a Reputable Solar Installer in Thailand” because this is such a common concern. Look for installers who are certified by the manufacturer, have a physical office you can visit, and can provide references from installations at least 2-3 years old. Feel free to email me the specific brands you’ve been quoted and I can give you my thoughts!
do they both work during rainy season or only when sunny? we get alot of rain up north from june to october
Both mono and poly panels work during rainy season, just at reduced output. They don’t need direct sunlight, they can generate electricity from diffused light on cloudy days too. You’ll typically see about 10-25% of normal output on overcast days depending on cloud thickness. This is actually where monocrystalline panels perform slightly better, they’re more efficient in low-light conditions. During heavy rain, output drops significantly but doesn’t stop completely. Your system will still generate some power even during the monsoon months!
Excellent article. I’m an engineer working on a resort project in Koh Samui and we’re specifying the solar installation now. The temperature coefficient information was particularly useful. One thing I’d add from our research is that with Thailand’s intense heat, the better temperature performance of monocrystalline becomes even more significant than in cooler climates. We calculated it could mean 3-5% better real-world performance over the system lifetime. Has anyone else done similar calculations for Thai conditions specifically?
Excellent point about the temperature coefficient in Thai conditions! Your 3-5% calculation aligns with what we’ve seen in field studies here. For commercial installations like your Koh Samui resort, that performance difference really adds up over 25 years. I’d love to feature a detailed case study on temperature performance in tropical climates. Would you be interested in sharing your project data once it’s operational? I think our readers would find real-world Thai performance data incredibly valuable. Thanks for adding this professional perspective!
thanks for this! been looking into solar for my shophouse in bangkok. the price difference seems quite big tho, is the mono really worth the extra 30-40% cost?? our roof gets full sun most of the day so maybe poly would work fine?
Great question! If your roof gets full sun most of the day with minimal shading, polycrystalline can definitely work well and save you money upfront. The 30-40% price difference is significant. However, consider this: if you have limited roof space and might want to expand your system later, mono panels will generate more power per square metre. For a shophouse in Bangkok where roof space is typically limited, that efficiency difference might be worth the investment. Calculate your actual energy needs and available roof space first, then decide if the extra efficiency justifies the cost. Sometimes poly makes perfect sense!
Really helpful breakdown! We’re renovating our house in Mae Rim and trying to decide between mono and poly panels. The space efficiency point you made really hits home since our roof area is pretty limited. Quick question though, with Thailand’s humidity levels, does one type handle moisture better than the other over the long term? I’ve heard mixed things from neighbours and want to make sure we’re making the right choice for the next 20+ years.
Thanks for your question, Sarah! Regarding moisture resistance, both panel types are sealed with tempered glass and weatherproof backing, so they handle humidity equally well from a waterproofing perspective. However, the frame quality and junction box sealing matter more than the cell type. For Mae Rim’s conditions, I’d recommend ensuring your installer uses panels with an IP67 or IP68 rated junction box and aluminium frames with good drainage channels. The bigger concern in humid areas is actually the inverter and electrical connections, so make sure those are properly protected. Given your limited roof space, monocrystalline would definitely be the smarter long-term investment. Feel free to reach out if you’d like installer recommendations for the Chiang Mai area!